data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1687/d1687faf74c18a52f462e7cf6937034cf9ba99d4" alt="Image result for little women"
Movie Review
4.899 out of 5 Stars
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1bc7/c1bc7454d26dd19c49c029c270b5935dc7a9d2bd" alt=""
I know, I know, I'm the worst. I am currently in the middle of it and really enjoying it, but it was just something that I never had to read for school and never caught my attention on its own. But that being said, this review is based solely on the movie in and of itself as a work of art, not so much as an adaptation of a literary work. Also, I'm not sure where to mark where spoilers start, so if you haven't seen the movie or read the book, you may just want to hold off on reading this until you do.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e978/7e9786e4a4510c5f62fa23e71da32227403de629" alt="Image result for little women"/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19545334/littlewomen3.jpg)
On a technical level, everything about it seemed really well done as well. I don't have any sort of theater or film studies background, but there were still some things that I really appreciated. For example, the whole film, while being set in the Civil War era, felt so incredibly modern, and that could not have been easy to accomplish, either in writing or directing. I don't believe this movie has any SAG Award nominations (sad), but Saoirse Ronan is up for a Golden Globe for playing Jo and Alexandre Desplat is up for a Golden Globe for original score. Nominations for the Oscars won't be announced for another couple of weeks, but I'm curious to see if they get any nominations there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed0af/ed0af970f5724dc577a316149494dae606580d9d" alt="Image result for little women":no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19555022/EP_191219787.jpg)
One of the small details that I really appreciated was the shift in lighting throughout the whole film. I don't know what exactly that's called, but I'm pretty sure that whenever the girls were in their childhood-happy-fun-innocent periods, the lighting was all golden and warm. But then in their adult periods, it was cooler and more blue. There was such a lovely connection then at the end when at the very end of it all, they're all adults with children at the school, but the lighting isn't blue like the other times that they are adults, but golden like when they were kids.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a19a/6a19aac0b1c6d5e7ae789c2cf4c39a9820c7343f" alt="Image result for little women"
Oh my God the attic scene where Jo has her monologue about being lonely was one of the best things I think I've seen in a movie in a loooooooong time. Everything from the words she was saying, to how she was slightly shaking, to how she punched emotion into certain words made the whole scene so potent and ripe with longing that Jo had pent up inside herself. I think that may be one of the scene that will be shown around in promos and stuff, but this one piece within the whole puzzle is 10x more powerful than it is alone.
I also really loved the scene in France where Amy tells Laurie that she refused the other guy's hand in marriage, but is like, "We don't need to say anything else about it," and he just kisses her. Ah!! Swoon!!!! But also, I really loved them together as a couple. There was a part of me that was disappointed for a bit that Jo and Laurie wouldn't be together, but Jo was right and it makes so much sense for them to only be friends. And then when she writes the letter to Laurie telling him she changed her mind, I was so mad because she didn't actually love him the way that he needed to be loved for a marriage, not like how Amy loved him. Jo wanted to not be along-- a very valid want-- but it would have been a cheap way to get it, and at the expense of both of their happiness. No, Amy and Laurie make so much more sense together and that scene in Paris was the proof of it. Laurie has finally realized that he loves Amy and knowing how she feels about him, acts perfectly on it. She doesn't initiate it, only coolly lets him know where things are at, and that is that. So perfect. I loved it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e55b1/e55b1f62eb8b4bca538b5dfbefa1614b33c8b12d" alt="Image result for little women"
Lastly, I have to give a shout-out to the literature element threaded throughout the entire story. No, duh, it's an adaptation of a literary classic, but I didn't realize how much more than that it was. Jo as a writer was a sight to behold. And the end bits where she labors over her book for Beth for hours on hours without end made the end production of the paper cutting and leather binding all the more satisfying. My mom actually pointed out this next part to me. They all have their children in the last scene. Meg has her kiddos, Amy has her baby, and Jo has her book. It's all so well-rounded with a perfect little ending. And oh my God, the part about an artists owning their work. LOVE THAT. I love that she asks the questions about what the copyright means and what it could be worth in the future, and then she bargains for it, taking a lower advance in the moment. I absolutely love that and I hope that other people on some level will recognize the importance of that as well.
Thanks for reading!
No comments:
Post a Comment